David Kirkpatrick

January 21, 2010

The New York Times takes aim …

Filed under: Business, Media, Technology — Tags: , , , — David Kirkpatrick @ 3:34 pm

… and promptly shoots foot.

Back when I used a browser with a “home page” the New York Times website was that starting block. The Old Grey Lady offered a nice slice of news across a huge swath of topics. On the heels of Rupert Murdoch announcing taking all his products behind a paywall by the middle of this year, the NYT is going on a limited free use model that will take its content behind a paywall for all except the most casual reader going into effect a year from now.

There’s no decent answer for content on the internet, but this move will absolutely kill the NYT’s traffic. I pay for Wall Street Journal content and have for years as a business expense. In this market I can’t afford another online subscription, so the result will be I’ll no longer use the NYT for linking or for getting a pulse of the day’s news. I’m betting I won’t be alone in that decision.

From the first link:

Starting in January 2011, a visitor to NYTimes.com will be allowed to view a certain number of articles free each month; to read more, the reader must pay a flat fee for unlimited access. Subscribers to the print newspaper, even those who subscribe only to the Sunday paper, will receive full access to the site without any additional charge.

Executives of  The New York Times Company said they wanted to create a system that would have little effect on the millions of occasional visitors to the site, while trying to cash in on the loyalty of more devoted readers. But fundamental features of the plan have not yet been decided, including how much the paper will charge for online subscriptions or how many articles a reader will be allowed to see without paying.

1 Comment »

  1. Hello, I’m Nita, a student of department of IR, Univ of Padjajaran, Indonesia. I read some of your article in New York Times about the Beghazi attack which is the topic of my thesis. I want to ask some of your point of view regarding this case. I really do hope your consideration and looking forward for your reply.
    Thanks !

    Comment by Nita Liana — May 22, 2013 @ 10:50 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: