David Kirkpatrick

March 31, 2008

An arguement for impeachment from the right

Filed under: Politics — Tags: , , , , — David Kirkpatrick @ 5:13 pm

Sure it’s easy to cruise around the blogoshpere and find calls for the impeachment of both Bush and Cheney on all manner of sites on the left. It’s not so often to come across a long and reasoned call for Bush’s impeachment from the right

At Taki’s Magazine Kevin R. C. Gutzman does just that basing the impeachment arguement on “taking back the Constitution.” The last straw for Gutzman is the Bush 43 regime stance on torture.

From the link:

On Saturday, March 8, 2008, President George W. Bush vetoed a congressional bill that would have explicitly banned interrogation techniques like waterboarding. In doing so, Bush cemented his worthiness of impeachment.

The impeachment power allows Congress to keep the other two branches from grasping at powers that the Constitution gives to the Legislative Branch. Congress is described in Article I of the Constitution, and its structure was the chief issue in the Philadelphia Convention. Why? Because in a republic, it is to be the most important branch.

People commonly repeat the idea today that the federal government features three equal branches. This is an error. Congress is to be the most important branch. The Founders generally feared the power of the executive and assigned the traditional royal powers in foreign policy to Congress instead of the president. The courts were to be even weaker, the “least dangerous” branch.

Yet, over time, the three have come to be more equal. This is the result of Congress’s supine attitude toward the other branches’ overreaching. When federal courts legislate, Congress does nothing. When presidents and their subordinates—generals, cabinet officials, and others—ignore statutory law, refuse to comply with congressional demands for information, or flat-out lie to Congress, Congress does nothing.

Each instance of the other branches’ grabbing at congressional power is later cited by that branch as a precedent justifying additional arrogations. Over time, the sum of these usurpations has been to reduce Congress’s stature within the federal government, and to make the federal government more unaccountable.

1 Comment »

  1. Wonderful goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you are just too fantastic.

    I really like what you’ve acquired here, really like what you’re stating and the way in which
    you say it. You make it entertaining and you
    still care for to keep it smart. I can not wait to read
    much more from you. This is actually a wonderful site.

    Comment by government consulting firms — September 24, 2013 @ 8:40 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: